hello to you all,
I am approaching Cachy after a long overnight stay on EndeavourOS and wanted to understand what, in your opinion, are the points in favour of Cachy compared to EndeavourOS.
Keep in mind that what I do with the pc is certainly surfing and using text editors but also short movies and above all playing games. I know that the problems there are more on the proton side than on the distro side.
Thanks
As an EOS user: EndeavourOS is - in a good sense - mainly Arch with an installer; plus some light convenience tools and a very friendly community.
Cachy is a lot more opinionated on tweaking the system for “performance”. That involves a wide variety of custom kernels, the CPU architecture aware repositories, cachyos-settings, …
There’s a good chance you can squeeze out more “performance” from the same desktop system while everything is still pretty much how you would run a vanilla Arch (or EOS) system.
3 Likes
Are those tweaks making also CachyOS better in terms of battery saving for a laptop?
Catchy seems faster to me, but has many bugs out the box
I have extended EOS with the cachy repositories. (-:
Therefore I have a Cachy EndeavorOS.
I love how cachy treats ZFS as a first class citizen.
1 Like
what kind of bugs? as a new user considering both this is imp to me