Thus, my sentence: “I realize it’s not a perfect metric, but the CachyOS Team should be very proud.”.
Also:
Hey y’all… Obligatory mention that DistroWatch rankings, at best, simply report how many times a given DistroWatch page was visited. Nothing more, nothing less.
Correct—and if you had actually read my post, you would’ve seen that indicated in the second sentence: “…it’s not a perfect metric…”
“That means it doesn’t actually mean almost anything. Except which pages—visited by DistroWatch users, who tend to be mostly newbies—have the most traffic. Which could even correlate to some sort of interest or drama.”
“That means it doesn’t actually mean almost anything.” — What?
The point of my post was that CachyOS has reached a level of visibility where people are actively seeking more information. It’s no longer some obscure or fringe distro—it’s becoming something with real momentum in the Linux community. Spoiler: That interest is the exact metric I and others were congratulating the CachyOS Team for.
Also, I find your use of the term ‘newbies’ unnecessarily derogatory. I hold a Ph.D. in Computer Science, teach at a top university, and I occasionally browse DistroWatch to learn about emerging distributions. Nobody is born an expert—everyone is a “newbie” at something, at some point.
“They in no way equate to overall reputation or current user count or similar.”
Again, if you had actually read my post, you’d know those claims were never made.
Finally, some constructive criticism: Rushing to dismiss a post because you think you understand what it’s saying only undermines your credibility. Copy-pasting information that most readers already know from DistroWatch doesn’t help either—it just further erodes your reputation.
Advice I give my students: It takes a lot of effort to build integrity—and very little to destroy credibility.