Installed CachyOS for the first time , after one week I am trying to update system and get following errors
:: Starting full system upgrade…
:: Replace mlocate with cachyos-extra-v3/plocate? [Y/n] y
:: Replace tracker3 with cachyos-v3/tinysparql? [Y/n] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (package architecture is not valid)
:: package cachy-browser-130.0.1-1-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package gcc-14.2.1+r134+gab884fffe3fc-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package gcc-libs-14.2.1+r134+gab884fffe3fc-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package lib32-gcc-libs-14.2.1+r134+gab884fffe3fc-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package lib32-mesa-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package lib32-mesa-vdpau-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package lib32-opencl-rusticl-mesa-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package lib32-vulkan-intel-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package linux-cachyos-6.11.0-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package linux-cachyos-headers-6.11.0-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package mesa-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package mesa-vdpau-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package opencl-rusticl-mesa-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package python-3.12.6-3-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package ripgrep-14.1.1-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package scx-scheds-1.0.4-3-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package svt-av1-2.2.1-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package tinysparql-3.8.0-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
:: package vulkan-intel-1:24.2.3-2-x86_64_v3 does not have a valid architecture
I had this same issue 8 days ago… was given some help which did not work for me…so I just reinstalled an hour ago. Could not find some extra help in other forums so I took the short way home.
What I understand is that CachyOS is not recognizing its own packages made for v3 supported systems. So why one should care about packages for a supported laptop/pc which become incompatible with the same system in next update? I dont understand all this exercise?
I bet you are wrong , I wasted time installing it from its Official released ISO , ISO/installer did not add the Architecture = x86_64 “x86_64_v3” part to this line then its not my fault and if you are making your guess from “x86_64” part as not being “auto” then you are again wrong because I change it myself from auto to x86_64 but if the CachyOS installer had added the “x86_64_v3” part to this line why would I remove it? because it will make happy to waste my time here asking for help? It is the worst behavior of some “gurus” “knowing everything” developers or users to assume and fire without accepting the flaws being pointed out. Nobody forced me to use CachyOS , but from day one it came out I have been testing it off and again and ended up in issues and now when it iis considered and advertised as “stable” it still has issues and forum in the name of forum is another waste of time and if you are one of the developer your one liner “help” shows how serious you are about your distro and that you have all the knowledge available in universe and you by your psychic powers know what a user is doing and that your divine helping powers can offer one liner “help” that make you look nothing more than a fool .
period!
Well here’s what you did wrong, of course v3 is not a valid architecture if you removed auto and only added x86_64. If you had kept it as auto, nothing would be broken.
Now you are talking! helping and throwing a stone at someone showing that you know all is not help.
Still no thanks , I had to shake your walls to talk!
Dont try to intimidate me with your polished words , nobody attacked anybody , I corrected a gurus “behavior” What you are gonna do? delete my post , block me? go ahead! but refrain from treating users as your “yes boss” , dont want to help , dont! but dont show attitude. You refrain from intimidating users on forum in future as well!